Bongiovanni's consistency in speculating on the work
of Siragusa without authorization
Eugenio Siragusa's thought,
in reply to Orazio Valenti's questions
Nicolosi, March 2002
The growing up-surging of some private and public affairs, the divulging of letters and magazines written by Giorgio Bongiovanni with expressions, methodologies and use of material taken from the files of the contactee Eugenio Siragusa, have convinced us to ask Siragusa himself so as to inform the public opinion through this site.
First, we refer to something published in January 2002 containing a number of "Messages to mankind" which are meant to be a reply "...to the world situation as it has developed following the event of the 11th September 2001".
Following our previous explanations, considering the further statements by Eugenio Siragusa, it seems fair to spend a few words for the sake of those who might have doubts about this.
We have no objection that Giorgio Bongiovanni carry on with his work which he chose to do of his own free will, for he firmly believes in it, yet we must note that:
- He still uses Eugenio Siragusa's personal symbols.
- He places Eugenio Siragusa's messages next to his as to confirm his own, in spite of the fact that they have nothing in common in source, contents and form.
- It is evident that they are a bad copy of Siragusa's messages.
If one wants to talk about the concepts expressed by Siragusa, one should make a precise reference and add one's own comment and investigation, certainly not by writing " parallel " messages.
![[Eugenio Siragusa]](f_eug04.jpg)
The methodologies on the table are so subtle as much as deceiving and can ultimately become useless and presumptuous. Why this? Simply because one who has no permission from Eugenio Siragusa, rather his objection, cannot and must not use his material.
It is not our intention to define eventual programs, or blame anyone, such as Giorgio Bongiovanni, who has dedicated his own life to this, but simply we do not wish that Eugenio Siragusa's work may suffer confusion and misunderstanding, as far as the essence of the message, life, and advices attuned with the lofty and elegant methodologies that the Lords of Space have operated upon our Planet. And this is an aspect of this contradiction whereby the Personages who contacted Siragusa has nothing to do with that Bongiovanni says to have contacts with.
The method of pointing at names and persons does not simulate the reader in making his mind work as well as his discernment; to make one person feel guilty is a human political tactic, whereas one should point at the eventual system of things, of general human choices in which we all share the same guilt. It is not like our Superior Brothers to use our language, our terms in defining the delinquent movements, as well as the reply with threats or violence even though a verbal one.
For instance, when Eugenio Siragusa wrote about the eight minutes necessary to stop every human weapon, it was not meant as a threat, but simply to make us understand that their dissuasive intervention would not be in benefit of someone or against someone else, not to violate us or induce us to reason, rather this would take place only the moment in which all would be irreversible and we would have lost our free will which would have saved us prior to this. Their Mission of salvation was such, and it was so before that irreparable moment.
Nowadays, who could define who are the leaders of the sides in war, the motives and the managing parts leading them?
And who could say that tomorrow might turn out new factors, new leaders or political games so different?
The message divulged by Siragusa does not talk about an intervention at the first or second outburst, it does not talk of trauma of redemption for mankind by means of a mass contact. The moment we decided to carry out the final destruction, we would be through.
May the Highest Father help us and illumine the minds of the rulers so that they may decide, along with all of us, not to proceed, for the sake of our children and of the new generation!
At that moment these Observers who obey the Heavenly Will, will not be weak, as they never have been.
In conclusion, combining the "bad" copy of the messages with the historical messages of Siragusa, is not well done.
For the above, we have asked Siragusa his opinion:
"It is a consistent speculation without authorization. Speculation has not only to do with money, it also has to do with using the name of a person, or fake nonexistent relationships. Speculating on his material, name, on things that belong to him, mix them with one's own things to the point of making them one's own. One can speculate on notoriety, integrity, work..."
We point out that E. Siragusa has never engaged in controversy with politics. Perhaps Bongiovanni is stimulated by forces that want to manipulate and falsify the work carried out by Siragusa?
"The source of his messages is not celestial - has replied Siragusa - and Giorgio Bongiovanni must not weigh on others what he engages in. Selling the Truth is unforgivable, although worse is still to come".
Is this in reference to an eventual decline of mankind?
"Man does not want to become aware of his possible elimination, since the Father has regretted having created man…"
![[NEWS]](giorna98.gif)
|
go to the regular view
send this news to a friend
